Compare Top 3 Smart Rings
Honorable Mentions
We have tested several other entrants in this category, some good, some bad, and some in between. Here’s the lowdown on some of your smart ring alternatives.
Photograph: Simon Hill
Oura Ring 4 for $349: While the Ring 5 is the smallest smart ring on the market, the Ring 4 is still slimmer and lighter than its predecessor. There’s also a ceramic version. Reviewer Simon Hill had issues with dwindling battery life and some scuffing with his silver Ring 4, but he hasn’t encountered those issues with the ceramic version.
Leep Ring for $199: A British smart ring that’s affordable, subscription-free, and offers simplified stats on your activity, sleep, and stress. Unfortunately, sleep is woefully inaccurate and tends to report that I’ve been asleep for my entire time in bed, even if I was watching TV or reading. One night, it suggested I slept 8 hours and 43 minutes (Oura said 6 hours and 52 minutes). The app could also use some polish. For example, it doesn’t take into account that it’s only a couple of hours into the day before telling me my movement for today is “Bad.” I also lost data on the first night it ran out of battery, and there was no warning notification to tell me to recharge. A fully charged ring is meant to last up to eight days, but I’ve been getting closer to five. —Simon Hill
RingConn Gen 2 for $299: Despite being $100 more than the Gen 2 Air, this is still a relatively affordable, subscription-free smart ring. The main differences here are that the Gen 2 offers sleep apnea monitoring and tracks VO2 max, and it’s a titanium build; the Gen 2 Air is made of stainless steel.
Circular Ring 2 for $354: This ring is pretty, with rounded edges that make it look slightly more like jewelry than the Oura or Ultrahuman rings. I like the closed charging case, which means you can bring it while traveling and recharge without a USB-C cable, and I also like that the ring pings me throughout the day when I’m in my best zone for productivity, working out, or caffeine. However, during my two-week testing period, I was plagued with persistent server issues and data processing delays that made it difficult to double-check any of my health metrics for accuracy, like heart rate, SpO2, or sleep data. —Adrienne So
Avoid These Smart Rings
Amazfit Helio Ring for $150: Amazfit is a purveyor of affordable fitness trackers like the Active 2, so I expected its smart ring to be competitive, but the Helio falls short in several areas. I like the textured bronze finish, but it is the only color you get. Sizes are limited to 8, 10, or 12 for now (sizes 7 to 13 are coming). Also, the Helio was often inaccurate, with heart rate measurements wildly out of step with other wearable tech. It lacks automatic workout tracking, battery life averaged three days for me, and it frequently disconnected from the busy and confusing Zepp app. There’s no monthly subscription fee, but there is Aura AI ($70/year) for sleep insights and content or Fitness ($30/year), which includes an AI coach. They are expensive and confusing. (Why have two separate subscriptions?) The Helio works much better in conjunction with a smartwatch (I tried it with the Amazfit Cheetah Pro), as it can merge the data, but as a stand-alone device, it is impossible to recommend. —Adrienne So
Movano Evie Ring for $269: When the subscription-free Movano Evie Ring first came out, it was touted as the fitness tracker for women. However, its menstrual health features are pretty underbaked compared to those offered by its competitors. Now that the Oura and the Galaxy Ring can track cycles accurately, this ring’s time may have passed. It’s also currently sold out.
Power up with unlimited access to WIRED. Get best-in-class reporting and exclusive subscriber content that’s too important to ignore. Subscribe Today.
Disclaimer : This story is auto aggregated by a computer programme and has not been created or edited by DOWNTHENEWS. Publisher: wired.com
