Workers are worried about AI taking their jobs—and it turns out they hate it when AI is involved in their screenings for roles, too. Now, virtual avatars and chatbots have made their way into interview rounds, and it’s triggering some candidates to drop out of the running altogether.
Around 63% of U.S. job-seekers have been interviewed by AI, according to a recent report from Greenhouse—a 13% increase from just six months ago. Sharawn Tipton, chief people officer of Greenhouse, tells Fortune HR professionals are deploying AI interviewers to “filter the flood” of applications trying to stand out in an intensely competitive labor market.
“Recruiters are inundated and they’re worried about being replaced. There’s a trust gap on both sides, and technology is outpacing change management. Nobody’s explaining to candidates that the process looks different now,” Tipton says. “The cost of all of this falls hardest on candidates.”
But it’s a serious professional turn-off: Around 38% of candidates have already withdrawn from a hiring process because it included an AI interview, and another 12% say they would drop out if they were required to do an AI interview. Even when they go through with it, the outcome doesn’t tend to be fruitful—about 51% of candidates who completed an AI interview were either ghosted entirely, or are still waiting to hear back. However, it should be noted the report didn’t provide data to compare against human interviewers, who have also been known to go dark on applicants.
Tipton says poor AI interviewer experiences could backfire on employers; job-hunters will talk to their friends about the bad encounter, or post about it on social media.
“Candidates aren’t walking away from AI. They’re walking from bad experiences caused by bad AI. They’re reacting to a feeling of being processed rather than considered,” the Greenhouse executive explains. “I talked to someone recently who’d just gotten a rejection email, and the wording of it made her feel like she was nothing.”
Tipton says that the AI-enabled interviewing process has become an “arms race, not a hiring process.” Job candidates feel that they have to play the numbers game just to be seen, while hiring managers deploy the technology to filter through thousands of applicants faster. In planning how to move forward with AI interviewing, the Greenhouse CPO advises employers to take a step back and assess their hiring process. She advises hiring managers to show that a person with judgment is reviewing AI assessments, alongside providing the option of a human interviewer.
“There’s a lot of focus on [AI] efficiency and productivity, but not enough on who benefits from that and who doesn’t,” Tipton says, also noting it could exacerbate the gap between talent who are coached on the tools, and those who don’t have that access. “If employers aren’t intentional about this now, AI hiring will scale the same inequities the industry has been trying to break, just faster.”
Emma Burleigh
Success Reporter
emma.burleigh@fortune.com
Around the Table
A round-up of the most important HR headlines.
KPMG issued a slew of layoffs affecting its U.S. audit partners and advisory workers after its voluntary retirement push fell short in convincing enough employees to leave. Wall Street Journal
Entry-level jobs requiring AI skills have doubled over the past year—and roles in government, health care, and education are seeing the “sharpest growth.” CNBC
The labor market’s cloudy skies are briefly clearing up, as U.S. jobless aid applications fell to 189,000 at the end of April—the lowest number in more than five decades. ABC News
Watercooler
Everything you need to know from Fortune.
Lemons into lemonade. America’s biggest Black-owned lender, OneUnited Bank, launched a podcast series interviewing high-profile guests on reframing a shameful experience as a success story. —Nick Lichtenberg
Meeting faux pas. Wrapping up a work meeting with high praise of its efficiency is actually a sign of a “bad” meeting, JPMorgan CEO Jamie Dimon says. Here’s his favorite way to end them. —Preston Fore
Hustle culture. The rat race comes with dangerous traps—more than 840,000 professionals die every year from health conditions linked to major psychosocial risks at work. —Catherina Gioino
Disclaimer : This story is auto aggregated by a computer programme and has not been created or edited by DOWNTHENEWS. Publisher: fortune.com
