-
Russell Brand has denied all the allegations made against him as he took to the witness box to give evidence in his trial at Southwark crown court.
-
The comedian, 51, told the court that his “entire life has been consumed by these allegations”.
-
Brand said he struggled to find anyone to give evidence on his behalf, saying the consequences of the September 2023 investigation by the Sunday Times, Times, and Channel 4 Dispatches were “devastating”.
-
He told jurors that he believed consent was “fundamental, essential, necessary and, indeed, in many ways more important than sex itself”.
-
During cross-examination, Brand admitted he was “obsessed” with sex in his younger years but denied being unable to function without it.
-
He denied the accusation that he would pretend to be gay to make women trust him.
Court is back in session.
Brand is being questioned by the prosecution on his statements about the allegations.
He denied constructing his account of events around what the complainants had alleged.
Karmy-Jones asked him about a statement he made in March this year, saying he had received accounts of the allegations from two of the complainants at that point.
She said: “So you knew what they said, and as I’ve already put to you, you constructed your account around some of what they said.”
Brand replied: “I disagree but I agree that you said it.”
During cross-examination, Russell Brand told the court he believes alcohol “makes people less effective as human beings”.
A woman who alleged he raped her in a Soho bar toilet in 2004 told the court in her evidence she had drunk six or seven vodkas before encountering Brand.
When prosecutor Riel Karmy-Jones told Brand it was “obvious she had been drinking”, Brand said: “Yeah, I suppose so.”
Karmy-Jones put to him that the woman was “more vulnerable”, Brand said: “I agree alcohol makes people less effective.”
When the judge, Mr Justice Bennathan, interjected to ask him to clarify, Brand said: “Effective human beings. It’s a deleterious substance.”
The court is taking a 20 minute break.
Brand said it was a “marvellous night” when he had a threesome with two women backstage at Hammersmith Apollo in 2009.
One of the women accused Brand of anally raping her during a second meeting at his flat a few days later.
Karmy-Jones put to him that it was an example of Brand “never leaving without a conquest” because the woman had refused to have full sex with him backstage.
Brand replied: “That actually went down as quite a marvellous night by the criteria of the time.”
Brand said that “going in and out of bathrooms didn’t attract a great deal of attention” during the time of the alleged offences.
When asked by Karmy-Jones if his behaviour was “normalised” by his peers, Brand said: “In the media in the early 2000s, people going in and out of bathrooms didn’t attract a great deal of attention.”
He added: “Maybe an eyeroll, eyebrow raise.”
Karmy-Jones asked Brand about the woman who alleged he grabbed her breasts before pulling her into a toilet and orally raped her at a bar in Soho in 2004.
When Karmy-Jones put it to him that he groped the woman and dragged her into the toilet, he denied it.
“What were you inviting her into the toilet for?” Karmy-Jones asked.
“For fooling around,” Brand replied.
Karmy-Jones asked him if he recalled telling the woman “don’t be a spoilsport, come on” when she protested, Brand said “I don’t remember”.
The prosecutor, Riel Karmy-Jones, asked Brand about the alleged attempted indecent assault against a woman who worked at MTV in 2001, who alleged the comedian grabbed her arm and tried to drag her into a toilet.
She said to Brand if he “quite enjoyed having sex in toilets” at the time, he replied “yes”.
Karmy-Jones asked: “Sex in toilets happened a lot didn’t it?”
Brand said: “Yes.”
Karmy-Jones asked if he remembered there being a struggle when he grabbed the woman’s arm, he said he did not recall.
Court is back in session.
Russell Brand’s cross-examination by the prosecution continues.
-
Russell Brand has denied all the allegations made against him as he took to the witness box to give evidence in his trial at Southwark crown court.
-
The comedian, 51, told the court that his “entire life has been consumed by these allegations”.
-
Brand said he struggled to find anyone to give evidence on his behalf, saying the consequences of the September 2023 investigation by the Sunday Times, Times, and Channel 4 Dispatches were “devastating”.
-
He told jurors that he believed consent was “fundamental, essential, necessary and, indeed, in many ways more important than sex itself”.
-
During cross-examination, Brand admitted he was “obsessed” with sex in his younger years but denied being unable to function without it.
-
He denied the accusation that he would pretend to be gay to make women trust him.
Court has adjourned for a break until 2pm.
Disclaimer : This story is auto aggregated by a computer programme and has not been created or edited by DOWNTHENEWS. Publisher: theguardian.com










