Golf instruction is ever-evolving, but the best advice stands the test of time. In GOLF.com’s series, Timeless Tips, we’re highlighting some of the greatest advice teachers and players have dispensed in the pages of GOLF Magazine. Today we look back at our June 2006 issue when we published the results of an experiment to find out the perfect tee height for maximizing distance with the driver.
Since advanced analytics have shed light on how important driving distance is for scoring, golfers of all abilities have been doing everything they can to add yards off the tee.
There are a number of avenues you can pursue in this regard. You can work out and speed train, or optimize your swing and setup with launch monitors and new equipment. No matter which way you take it, the goal is all the same: hit more bombs.
One such (overlooked) method for hitting the ball further is teeing the ball up at the correct height for maximal distance. But which height is the best when going this route? Back in 2006, GOLF Magazine conducted a test to find out. And while plenty has changed in the game since that time, there are still some takeaways that hold true to this day.
Check it out below.
<figure class="youtube-facade" data-content="
“>
What’s the optimal tee height with driver?
You’re on the tee box of a brutal par-4 and really need to bust one if you’re going to get home in two. What’s your swing key? One thing that you’re probably not thinking about is how high you’ve teed your ball — but you should be. Tweaking your tee height, as it turns out, is one of the best — and easiest — adjustments you can make you pound higher and longer drives.
Keep reading below to find out why.
The study
Who took part
Twenty-seven golfers, aged 25 to 71, with handicaps ranging from scratch to 29. Of the players, 25 typically used a mid-tee height and two preferred a high tee height.
The tee heights
—Low: The top edge of the ball was even with the top edge of the driver, so the entire ball was below the crown.
—Mid: Half the ball above the crown.
—High: The bottom edge of the ball was slightly above the top edge of the clubface so that the entire ball was above the crown.
The experiment
Players were divided into three groups of nine by handicap level: 0-9, 10-19 and 20+. Each golfer hit 10 drives at each tee height, with each group hitting from the three tee heights in varying order to ensure that fatigue and motivation were balanced within each group. Only the best five out of the 10 drives at each tee height were recorded so that mis-hits would not skew the data.
Carry distance was measured by a launch monitor, which also calculated clubhead speed, launch angle, ball speed and spin. Accuracy was also recorded: drives that landed in the fairway (33 yards wide) scored 1; those in the right or left rough (17 yards wide) scored 2; and those that landed beyond the rough scored 3.
The results
Within each of the three handicap levels, carry distance for mid and high tee heights was significantly longer than the low tee height, largely an effect of the higher tees promoting higher launch angles and less spin. The high tee height provided the most distance, giving the players an average of 12 extra yards of carry per drive than the low tee height.
Inside the numbers
| Low tee | Mid tee | High tee | |
| Low handicap (0-9) | |||
| Carry distance (yards) | 211.64 | 219.62 | 222.92 |
| Launch angle (degrees) | 10.5 | 13.04 | 13.17 |
| Spin (rpm) | 4,051 | 3,875 | 3,434 |
| Clubhead speed (mph) | 98.32 | 97.08 | 97.36 |
| Ball speed (mph) | 138.59 | 138.13 | 138.95 |
| Mid handicap (10-19) | |||
| Carry distance (yards) | 171.46 | 177.84 | 179.84 |
| Launch angle (degrees) | 12.4 | 14.4 | 14.04 |
| Spin (rpm) | 3,844 | 3,794 | 3,529 |
| Clubhead speed (mph) | 86.04 | 85.76 | 85.24 |
| Ball speed (mph) | 120.9 | 120.93 | 120.93 |
| High handicap (20+) | |||
| Carry distance (yards) | 160.85 | 174.15 | 178.24 |
| Launch angle (degrees) | 11.23 | 13.7 | 14.75 |
| Spin (rpm) | 3,834 | 3,801 | 3,591 |
| Clubhead speed (mph) | 85.39 | 85.87 | 85.01 |
| Ball speed (mph) | 120.15 | 120.92 | 120.39 |
The biggest winners
High-handicappers benefitted the most from the high tee height, picking up an average of 18 yards over their drives with the low tee height.
Long and straight
The increases in carry distance from the low to the mid and high tee heights did not come at the expense of accuracy in terms of hitting the fairway. The table below presents the percentage of tee shots landing in the fairway, rough and beyond the rough as a function of tee height.
| Fairway | Rough | Beyond rough | |
| Low tee | 58.5% | 30.4% | 11.1% |
| Mid tee | 54.1% | 34.1% | 11.9% |
| High tee | 61.5% | 27.4% | 11.1% |
Aftermath
Following the experiment, nine out of 27 players planned to change from mid to high tee height. Three of those nine were from the low-handicap group.
Thee tee height study was conducted by GOLF Top 100 Teacher Eric Alpenfels and Bob Christian, Ph.D dean emeritus of the School of Health and Human Performance at the University of North Carolina-Greensboro.
Disclaimer : This story is auto aggregated by a computer programme and has not been created or edited by DOWNTHENEWS. Publisher: golf.com
